{"id":2557,"date":"2010-06-02T08:53:48","date_gmt":"2010-06-02T16:53:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/?p=2557"},"modified":"2010-06-02T08:53:48","modified_gmt":"2010-06-02T16:53:48","slug":"the-new-washington-beer-tax-more-details-and-how-it-affects-local-breweries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/2010\/06\/the-new-washington-beer-tax-more-details-and-how-it-affects-local-breweries\/","title":{"rendered":"The New Washington Beer Tax &#8211; More Details and How It Affects Local Breweries"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday&#8217;s implementation of a new beer tax in Washington left some of us scratching our heads wondering what it all really means. Many of the mainstream press articles point out that this tax will not affect small, local breweries, but that is not entirely true. I spoke with Heather McClung, president of the Washington Brewers Guild, to help clear up some questions. Following are some details about the new tax.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>This is not a direct to consumer sales tax<\/strong>. In other words, consumers won&#8217;t be seeing an immediate increase within a separate tax line-item on your receipt at the store when they go pick up that six-pack of Bud today. The tax is levied against the producers of the beer. How much of that tax is then passed on to the distributors, retailers and the consumer is the question that will be answered over time. Some brewers may absorb the tax, others may not.<\/li>\n<li>The new added tax amounts to $15.50 per barrel of 31-gallons. This almost triples the total tax for affected breweries, from $8.08 per barrel to $23.58 per barrel. That is about $.28 extra per six-pack. Or, $1.12 extra per case of 24, $7.75 per typical 1\/2 barrel keg or just over $0.06 per 16oz pint.<\/li>\n<li>Domestic breweries that <strong>sell less than 60,000 barrels<\/strong> (120,000 kegs) of beer in the state of Washington will be exempt from paying the tax. Again &#8211; this tax exclusion is not based on how much overall beer a brewery produces or where they are located, but with how much beer it sells in Washington. This tax will apply to all foreign breweries importing their beers into WA (regardless of volume), as well as larger domestic breweries. While I don&#8217;t have brewing volumes at my finger tips, I verified with two of the larger WA breweries, Mac &amp; Jack&#8217;s and Pyramid, that they will be exempt from the tax.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The sale of any &#8220;strong beer&#8221; is not exempt from the tax, regardless of overall volume<\/strong>. Strong beer is designated by the Department of Revenue as anything 10% alcohol by volume  (8% alcohol by weight) or greater. For example, barleywines greater than 10% ABV produced by local breweries will have the added tax. This is contrary to the belief that this new tax won&#8217;t affect local breweries. The effect won&#8217;t be massive, but it will touch local breweries. It&#8217;s possible (but probably not likely) that this could influence breweries to brew less high gravity beers or to shoot for their strong beers to come in at 9.9% ABV.<\/li>\n<li>The state expects that this beer tax will raise a total of $180 million from when it was implemented on June 1, 2010 through when it is set to expire (yeah, right) on June 30, 2013.<\/li>\n<li>This moves Washington from being the state with the 18th highest beer taxes in the country to having the 3rd or 4th highest beer taxes in the country (I&#8217;ve seen conflicting reports).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>According to McClung, the issue isn&#8217;t just about the direct increase itself. &#8220;The real issue is that the way that this came about sets a horrible precedent. There was no talk of any beer tax all session long, and this initiative came to fruition within a week or two. None of the legislators talked with any key stakeholders, such as distributors, large breweries, small breweries, or the restaurant association, all of which will be affected by this. There was no public hearing, and they just pushed the tax through by using &#8216;small beer&#8217; as the conscience-saver for all of the legislators. It really is kind of dangerous for the future.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>McClung goes on to explain how the increase could affect retailers as well as local breweries indirectly. &#8220;It&#8217;s unclear at this point how many producers will suck up the tax, and how many will push it down the line. If they push it down, then the gap between macro beer and micro beer will theoretically lessen.&#8221; Heather makes a great point about the gap lessening between what is perceived to be value products vs. premium products. Sounds like a great thing for the local craft beer market, right? Well, maybe. She goes on to clarify, &#8220;I say theoretically, because retailers likely won&#8217;t allow that gap to  become too little, because they need to maintain differential pricing  between the two tiers of products. So, it&#8217;s possible that if they feel  they need to raise macro prices they may also accordingly raise micro  prices.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mike Brown, Commissioner of Inspiration and Aspiration for Pyramid Breweries commented: &#8220;It is a regressive tax by nature. This isolates beer and not setting a tax on other beverages sets a dangerous precedent. While we appreciate the attempt to minimize the impact on craft brands who sell less than 60,000 bbls, the tax will still have a significant impact.  Retailers, distributors, and bars will need to raise the price across the board to offset the tax, which will affect all beers and cause all beer prices to increase.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If anyone has additional or conflicting information, please feel free to post or <a href=\"mailto: geoff.kaiser@brewingnews.com\" target=\"_blank\">email me<\/a>. I don&#8217;t claim to be an expert on this&#8230;just trying to clear things up. Hopefully this was helpful.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday&#8217;s implementation of a new beer tax in Washington left some of us scratching our heads wondering what it all really means. Many of the mainstream press articles point out that this tax will not affect small, local breweries, but that is not entirely true. I spoke with Heather McClung, president of the Washington Brewers [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[59,18],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2557"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2557"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2557\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2568,"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2557\/revisions\/2568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/seattlebeernews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}